+


CORE PHYSICS

a taxonomy




PREAMBLE


THE CORE GLOSSARY

Index


Taxa:
FUNDAMIDES

Taxon:
Teels

Taxon:
Teelons

Taxa
PHOTIDES

Taxon
Liquidons

Taxon
Solidons

Taxon:
Photons

Taxa:
MORPHIDES

Taxon:
Quarks

Taxon:
Electroids

Taxon:
Nucleons

Taxa:
ISOTOPES

Taxon:
Nobleisotopes

Taxon:
Amalisotopes

Taxon:
Radioisotopes

Taxa:
MOLECULES

Taxon:
Homocules

Taxon:
Hetocules

Taxon:
Polycules

Taxa:
ACCRETIDES

Taxon:
Protostars

Taxon:
Contractastars

Taxon:
Collapsastars

Taxa:
GALACTIDES

Taxon:
Globulars

Taxon:
Galaxies

Taxon:
Galactars

* * * * *

HOLISTIC
IMPLICATIONS


Moment
Zero


The
Uberuniverse


* * * * *

DIGRESSIONS

Stabilisation
turbines


Darkmatter
and
Darkenergy

Life


* * * * *

PREVIOUS ITERATIONS


The Blue Book (1996)

Principia Cosmologica
(2008)


Template
(2014)




















CLASS A - FUNDAMENTS
TAXON A1 - TEELS




Revised:  21st August 2020




PART 1  - SPECIFICATION

Part 1a:   Structure
Part 1b:   Properties
Part 1c:   Measures

PART 2 - NOTES

Part 2a;   Relativity
Part 2b:   Energy
Part 2c:   Mass
Part 2d:   Repellence

PART 3 - COMMENTS

Part 3a;   Perspective
Part 3b:   Conundrums





Back to top | Chapter 2






PART 1 - SPECIFICATION



TEEL          A hypothetical object. The only Type 1 object. The fundamental object, out of numbers of which all other object types are made. The properties attributed to the teel are those found in every object type empirically confirmed to exist. Properties not found in every empirically confirmed object type are not attributed to the teel. Until it is shown to be otherwise, it is assumed that every teel is identical to every other teel.




Part 1a:   Structure


Structure          A system of discrete parts held for a measurable time.



Part 1b:     Properties


Property          An abstract, qualitative, attribute. A teel attribute not defined by strength, number, rate, degree, etc.


  • Energy
    • A compendium term for the different measurements of the motion of a teel.
    • A comparative term for the motion of a teel when the measurements are unknown or unnecessary.
  • Mass
    • A compendium term for the different measurements of the gravitypull of a teel.
    • A comparative term for the gravitypull of a teel when the measurements are unknown or unnecessary.
  • Repellence
    • A compendium term for the different measurements of a teel arising from the Repellency Law.
    • A comparative term for the repellence of a teel when the measurements are unknown or unnecessary.



Part 1c:   Measures


Measure          A concrete, quantitative, attribute derived from one of the properties of a teel.

Measurement          The degree, magnitude, number, rate, strength, etc, of one of the measures of a teel.




Energy measures
    • Extrinsicspin          The spin of a teel relative to its mutual masscentre with another object.
Mass measures
  • Gravitypull          The ability of a teel to pull other objects toward it.
  • Inertia          The ability of a teel to resist the gravitypull of other objects.
    • Extrinsicinertia          The strength of a teel's resistance to the gravitypull of another object.
Repellence measures
    • Density          The strength of a teel's resistance to deformation or penetration.


Back to top | Chapter 2






PART 2 - NOTES





Part 2a:   Relativity


Relativity          The state of being relative to something else.



The Universe consists of space and teels. Teels are the substance of the Universe. Space is nothingness. Because space doesn't exist, it offers no yardsticks for measurement. Consequently, all measures are gauged relative to teels. Thus:
  • Energy measures are gauged by relating one teel to another.
  • Mass measures are gauged by relating one teel to another.
    • Assumption:     the gravitypull strength of every teel is the same.
  • Repellence measures are gauged by relating one teel to another.
    • Assumption:     the density of every teel is 100%.
    • Assumption:     every teel is a perfect sphere.
    • Assumption:     the dimensions of every teel are the same.
  • Space measures are gauged relative to teels.



Part 2b:   Energy


Energy          A compendium term for the different measures of the motion of a teel.



Energy is an aspect of mass because teels can have no speed without there first being gravitypull. Energy is also an aspect of repellence because teels can have no spin without there first being density. Neither aspect is dominant so energy is treated as a property in its own right.

The speed and spin of a teel is 
mathematically equatable. Thus:
  • A teel is a perfect sphere.
  • A teel has a circumference.
  • The circumference has a length.
  • The length of the circumference, multiplied by the number of times the teel spins in a given time period, gives a speed equivalent for spin.
  • The sum of the speed and spin (over a given time period and relative to another teel) is a teel's spinspeed.
Spinspeed is key when teels collide. During collisions, speed can transmute to spin and spin can transmute to speed. This gives rise to the Spinspeed law.
  • The Spinspeed Law          One unit of speed or spin can transmute into any ratio of speed or spin but the sum of that speed or spin is always one unit.
The sum of a teel's speed and spin is its energy. This gives rise to the Energy Law.
  • The Energy Law          When two teels collide, the energy of each teel may change but the sum of their energies does not.



Part 2c:   Mass


MASS          A compendium term for the different measures of the gravitypull of a teel.



All mass measures are relative measurements. The gravitypull and inertia measurements of a teel are gauged by the Gravitational Inverse Square Law.
Gravitypull and inertia, in exactly opposite circumstances, counteract each other exactly.

In relativity-physics, the effects of mass are seen in the gravitypull interactions between objects. In quantum-physics, objects have mass measures but interactions result from four fundamental forces: gravity, the strongforce, the weakforce, and the electromagneticforce.




Part 2d:   Repellence


REPELLENCE          A compendium term for the measures of a teel arising from the Repellency Law.



Repellence is not a recognised property in relativity-physics. In quantum-physics, the Pauli Exclusion Principle is broadly similar.

Repellence measurements are the result of teel collisions. They are governed by the Repellency Law.
Because of the Repellency Law, one teel cannot pass through another. Thus:
For simplicity, it is assumed that all teels are 100% dense and thus 100% resistant to deformation or penetration. It is also assumed that all teels have the same dimensions.

Repellence is not an opposite to the attractance of mass. The effect of mass is felt at a distance and continuously. The effect of repellence is only felt on contact. Core physics currently offers no explanation for either effect.


Back to top | Chapter 2






PART 3 - COMMENTS




Part 3a:   Perspective



Consider the top quark and the electron neutrino. Both are fundamental fermions but the former is 78 billion times more massive than the latter. Seventy eight billion!

Now consider some possibilities for the unknown. The least substantial object type empirically confirmed to exist is the photon. However, photons are far too insubstantial to be seen directly.

Notwithstanding the insubstantiality of photons, Core Physics requires (at least) four types of object even less substantial. There is no reason to suppose the mass differences between these objects are not in the same order as the differences between the top quark and the electron neutrino. Which makes the teel a very insubstantial object indeed.



Part 3b:   Conundrums



The evolutionary Core Physics takes the three properties found in every empirically confirmed object type and assumes they are properties of the teel. This assumption provides a floor of properties than cannot be broken through without more information being discovered.

The tack taken by the devolutionary Current Physics Paradigm is different. In its explorations into the unknown, there is no floor of properties. This is not wrong. The way to discovery is as much through trial and error as it is through deep thought. However, it does mean the "sharp end" of the Paradigm is beset by conundrums: models, theories, and bright ideas that don't mesh together.

Because Core Physics is confirmatory, not exploratory, the conundrums do not arise. Were they to do so, the Core Physics model would be wrong and would need reconsideration. Here are some examples:

Baryon Asymmetry

In the Paradigm, it is not understood why there is more matter than antimatter. In Core Physics, an antimatter object is an unaligned axially structured object. Such objects either  align themselves or they annihilate. Thus the Core Physics universe is a matter universe.

Big Bang Model

In the Paradigm, the diameter of the Universe at 10
-43 of a second after the Big Bang is reduced to one Planck Length. In Core Physics, because the repellence of teels is 100%, contraction to one Planck Length is not possible.

Gravitational Singularities

In the Paradigm, a gravitational singularity is a location in which gravitypull becomes infinitely strong. In Core Physics, the 100% repellence of teels places a finite limit on the gravitypull strength of any object.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy

In the Paradigm, darkmatter is thought to be some 85% of the matter of the universe and darkenergy is some 68% of the energy of the observable universe. In Core Physics, both are accounted for by the teelospheres that surround every type of photoidic object. Teels are the raw material of every teelosphere but many of them are bound into more substantial subphotonic objects: teeloids, gravitoids, and photoids.

Horizon Problem

In the Paradigm, the Horizon Problem arises from the assumption that no objects can exceed lightspeed. In Core Physics, all subphotonic objects can, and do, move faster than lightspeed. Consequently, the Horizon Problem is not a problem.

Lightspeed

In the Paradigm, photons do not exceed lightspeed because it is cosmically impossible for them to do so. In Core Physics, photons move at lightspeed for mechanical reasons.

Mass-energy equivalence

In the Paradigm, mass and energy are different aspects of the same property. In Core Physics, they are not. However, there can be no speed (energy) without gravitypull (mass) so the two are one. At the same time, there can be no spin (energy) without density (repellence) so this two are also one. All three properties are interconnected but, given the Spinspeed Law, it is currently practical to treat the three as discrete.

Repellence

In the Paradigm, many objects repel (or repulse) other objects but repellence is not a discrete property attributed to all object types. The Pauli Exclusion Principle covers much of its ground but only in quantum-physics, not in relativity-physics. In Core Physics, repellence is a discrete property found in every object type.

Space Curvature

In the Paradigm, space curves in the presence of mass. In Core Physics, teeloceans and teelospheres curve around their teelcore to produce the same effect.

Spacetime

In the Paradigm, the four dimensions of space and time are inseparably joined together. In Core Physics, (a) space is nothingness, and (b) time is a progress measurement. The examples that apparently confirm the Paradigm view have mechanical explanations.

Time Dilation

In the Paradigm, time dilates due to (a) disparate velocities, and (b) gravitypull. In Core Physics, the examples that apparently confirm the Paradigm view have mechanical explanations.

Two physics conundrums are not resolved in Core Physics. The origin of the two properties mass and repellence? The conundrums cannot be resolved because there is insufficient information.

That the properties exist is selfevident. Two objects will be drawn toward each other (mass). Two objects will be unable to pass through each other without effect (repellence). Why they exist, however, is not selfevident at all.



Back to top | Chapter 2







Comments and suggestions:  peter.ed.winchester@gmail.com

Copyright 2020 Peter (Ed) Winchester