SELFPROOF 0119 - GRAVITATIONAL WAVESCURRENT PARADIGM
- GRAVITATIONAL WAVES are ripples in the curvature of spacetime that propagate as waves
at the speed of light, generated in certain gravitational interactions
that propagate outward from their source. The possibility of
gravitational waves was discussed in 1893 by Oliver Heaviside using the analogy between the inverse-square law in gravitation and electricity. In 1905 Henri Poincaré
first proposed gravitational waves emanating from a body and
propagating at the speed of light as being required by the Lorentz
transformations. Predicted in 1916 by Albert Einstein on the basis of his theory of general relativity, gravitational waves transport energy as gravitational radiation, a form of radiant energy similar to electromagnetic radiation. Gravitational waves cannot exist in the Newton's law of universal gravitation,
since it is predicated on the assumption that physical interactions
propagate at infinite speed. .....
Potential sources of detectable gravitational waves include binary star systems composed of white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes. On February 11, 2016, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration teams announced that they had made the first observation of gravitational waves, originating from a pair of merging black holes using the Advanced LIGO detectors. On June 15, 2016, a second detection of gravitational waves from coalescing black holes was announced. (Wikipedia - 01 Sep 2016)
MALTA TEMPLATE
COMMENTARY
In
the Malta Template space is a nothingness. Consequently, it is not
a continuum with time
and cannot support ripples. Yet
the idea of gravitational waves has been in play for over 100
years and the announcements by the LIGO team of the detection
of gravitational waves emanating from colliding blackholes would seem to confirm their existence.
There appears to be a mismatch here but appearances are deceptive.
The Template and the Current Paradigm
both use the same empirically
proven factbase. The difference stems from the evolutionary Template
and the devolutionary Paradigm coming at the same problem from
different directions and giving different names to the same phenomenon.
Here is a simplified description of the
evolutionary Universe: - The Universe consists of a region of space within which there are many objects.
- The objects are either gravitons or are composite objects made of gravitons.
- The objects increase in absolute mass according to the number of gravitons they contain.
- The most massive object is the Universe itself.
- All blackholes are graviton composites.
- Some objects are blackhole composites.
- All blackholes have a solidbonded gravitoncore.
- Blackholes of sufficient mass enclose the gravitoncore in a liquidbonded gravitonocean.
- Blackholes of sufficient mass enclose the gravitonocean in a gasbonded gravitonosphere.
- All gravitonospheres, bar that of the Universe, are within the gravitonosphere of a larger object.
- Thus any part of the Universe that is not a solidbonded
gravitoncore, or a liquidbonded gravitonocean, is a gasbonded
gravitonosphere.
- All gravitonospheres are conditioned by gravity, rejectivity, and spinspeed.
- Consequently all gravitonospheres are formed into gravitonstreams.
- Each gravitonstream, at any particular place, has a vector and a dynamic mass.
All objects are subject to the same laws of physics. Thus they are all subject to collision
mechanics. Thus waves can be triggered in any congregation of objects as
long as the circumstances are appropriate. The waves move through
the congregation as the objects collide with each other, Newton's
Cradle fashion. Waves can be triggered in metals, liquids,
and gases. They can occur in solid iron, in molten iron and gaseous iron: in
rock, ice, water, and air. And in gravitonospheres. An easy way to trigger waves
in water or air is to explode or collide something. This is also a good
way to trigger gravitonwaves. Any convulsion (a supernova, a galactic
collision, a sunquake, and so on) will trigger gravitonwaves that move
outward from the source. That said, the insubstantiality of gravitons
means that being able to detect gravitonwaves here on Earth
currently requires the triggering convulsion to be a major event. This
is especially true if the convulsion is very distant because the wave
must travel through many gravitonstreams, each with its own vector
and dynamic mass.
CONCLUSION
The
Current Paradigm's description of gravitational waves, and the Malta
Template's description of gravitonwaves, look different but the
difference is superficial. It is a matter of the direction from which
the description comes. The Current Paradigm description is a
devolutionary one, looking backward in time and downward in size,
seeing as far as possible with the instruments
available, beyond which there is no choice but to indulge in
(highly) educated guesswork - the current best
guess being that space (with time) is a "fabric" that will
support
ripples. The Malta Template is evolutionary in that it starts with
the graviton and builds up, naturally and without forcing, into a
Universe that happens to look exactly like
the one we inhabit. Along the way, hypothetical gravitonospheres evolve
which perform the same function, and produce the same results as the
hypothetical spacetime fabric. The spacetime
universe and the gravitonosphere universe are not facts.
They are philosophical interpretations of the few facts that have been
empirically established. As such, neither is likely to be wholly
accurate but one
factor suggests that the Template interpretation is nearer the
mark. It is the ubiquity of gravitonospheres. They are, directly or
indirectly, in one form or another, responsible for everything that
goes on in the Universe. Gravitonospheres are mass and energy, gravity and rejectivity. They are the darkmatter that slows the collapse of galaxies, the
darkenergy that accelerates the expansion of the Universe, they are what makes one
particle charged and another uncharged, they provide the underlying
mechanism for electromagnetism, they are one half of the strong force
mechanism, they are one half of why different photons have
different wavelengths, and so on. The spacetime interpretation can't match that.
|