SELFPROOF 0118 - TIME DILATIONCURRENT PARADIGM
- TIME DILATION: In
the theory of relativity, time dilation is a difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by observers either moving relative to each other or differently situated from a gravitational mass or masses. A clock at rest with respect to one observer may be measured to tick at a
different rate when compared to a second observer's clock. This effect
arises neither from technical aspects of the clocks nor from the
propagation time of signals, but from the nature of spacetime. (Wikipedia - 26 Mar 2012)
- RELATIVISTIC VELOCITY TIME DILATION: When two observers are in relative uniform motion and uninfluenced by
any gravitational mass, the point of view of each will be that the
other's (moving) clock is ticking at a slower rate than the local clock. The faster the relative velocity, the greater the magnitude of time dilation. (Wikipedia - 31 Aug 2016)
- GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION: The key is that both observers are
differently situated in their distance from a significant gravitational
mass. The general theory of relativity describes how, for both observers, the clock that is closer to the gravitational mass, i.e. deeper in its "gravity well",
appears to go more slowly than the clock that is more distant from the
mass. In the case of a satellite orbiting a planet, it has the opposite
effect of the relative velocity time dilation. (Wikipedia - 31 Aug 2016)
MALTA TEMPLATE
- 0106-01:
That every graviton is subject to the passage of time but the
passage of that time can only be measured by reference to events.
- 0106-02: That events taking place within the Universe enable the passage of time for the Universe to be measured.
COMMENTARY
The
current paradigm assumes that time, as a component of a space-time
continuum, has a physical presence that can expand or contract. In the
Malta Template space and time
are both nothingnesses and thus cannot form a continuum. The difference
between the two descriptions stems from the way they have been
compiled. The Current Paradigm description is devolutionary in that it
is rooted in phenomena seen by human-scale observers which are then
generalised. The Malta Template description is evolutionary in that it
evolves fundamental particles forward toward a point of selfproof. At
first glance it might seem that the difference between the two
descriptions is so great that it cannot be bridged but this is not
so. First consider their similarities. - The Current Paradigm and the Malta Template both measure the passage of time by observing the operation of mechanisms and processes
and relating the observations to the operation of other mechanisms and
processes (eg: the Earth takes 24 hours to rotate once, against
which can be measured the lengthening/shortening of the daylight
hours).
Then consider the root cause of their dissimilarities:
- In
the Current Paradigm there is no fundamental mechanism that underpins
every other mechanism. The least substantial particles that have been
positively identified are the elementary particles and there are twenty
four our those. Effectively, each of the elementary particles is
involved in mechanisms, some of which are unique to specific
particles.
- In the Malta Template, there is a single
fundamental particle, the graviton, out of numbers of which each of the
elementary particles is made. Similarly there is a single fundamental
mechanism that underpins all other mechanisms.
The single fundamental mechanism is the gravitonpair. It consists of a pair of adjacent gravitons that are coorbiting each other. Any alteration to the coorbit of the pair is a switch which is triggered when: - There is a change in the external gravitypull strength to which the gravitonpair is being subjected.
- There is an internal input or outtake of energy due to collision.
Consider
an unpowered adjacent gravitonpair which is within the gravitysheath of
Planet Earth, close to the surface and thus some distance away
from the Earth's centre of gravity (COG) - If the gravitonpair moves away from the COG, the realspeed of its gravitons decelerates as kineticenergy transmutes to potentialenergy.
- The deceleration allows the mutual gravitypull of the gravitons to converge them commensurately.
- In converging the realspeed of the gravitons accelerates as potentialenergy transmutes to kineticenergy.
- This is a multiprocess in which the the deceleration dominates the acceleration.
- Thus, in moving away from the COG, the gravitonpair mechanism slows down.
- Thus, conversely, in moving toward the COG, the gravitonpair mechanism speeds up.
Now consider an adjacent gravitonpair which is part of the structure
of a rocket which is standing on a launchpad on Planet Earth. While on
the launchpad, the gravitonpair is unpowered. When the rocket is fired, the gravitonpair becomes powered. - The
rocket is fired and as it
accelerates away from the launchpad, the realspeed of the gravitons in
the gravitonpair accelerates due to collisions with the surrounding
gravitons.
- The acceleration of the gravitons counters their mutual gravitypull allowing them to diverge commensurately.
- In diverging, the realspeed of the gravitons decelerates as kineticenergy transmutes to potentialenergy.
- This is a multiprocess in which the acceleration dominates the deceleration.
- Thus, in being accelerated under power, the gravitonpair mechanism speeds up.
- Thus, conversely, in being decelerated under power, the gravitonpair mechanism slows down.
The
two circumstances are not mutually exclusive. Both can be operating at
the same time in a further multiprocess. Thus a gravitonpair mechanism,
taking off from the surface of the Earth as part of the structure of a
rocket, will both slow down as it moves away from the Earth's COG and
speed up as the rocket accelerates. And what is true for a single
gravitonpair is also true for objects which a made up of numbers of
gravitonpairs. The Universe is filled with objects (ants, rocks,
humans,
planets, stars, galaxies, etc), each of which consists of
gravitonpairs grouped into the substructures that are
the mechanisms of the objects. Consider this circumstance:
- Stand two human "mechanisms" on the surface of Planet Earth.
- Both are subject to the same measure of the Earth's gravitypull.
- Consequently each human mechanism is operating at the same speed.
- Now place one of the human mechanisms in a spaceship and accelerate it out into space.
- The
human mechanism on the spaceship slows down commensurately as the
strength of the gravitypull of the Earth progressively decreases.
- Thus,
"time" for the human mechanism on the spaceship decelerates while
time for the human mechanism remaining on the surface does not.
Now consider a second circumstance:
- Stand the same two human mechanisms on the surface of Planet Earth.
- As before, both are subject to the same measure of the Earth's gravitypull.
- Consequently, as before, each human mechanism is operating at the same speed.
- Now place one of the human mechanisms in a spaceship and accelerate it out into space.
- The
human mechanism on the spaceship speeds up commensurately as it
absorbs energy from the rocket motors through its gravitons being
collided with by the gravitons in the spaceship structure.
- Thus
time for the human mechanism on the spaceship accelerates for as long
as the motors are running while time for the human mechanism remaining
on the surface does not.
In the Current Paradigm "(the
time dilation) effect arises neither from technical aspects (of the
clocks), nor from the fact that the signals need time to propagate, but
from the nature of spacetime itself". In the Malta Template, time
dilation is the gravitonpair mechanism in action.
|