In the Current Paradigm, the electron is an elementary fermion and thus indivisible. In the Malta Template it is a composite particle that consists of a pair of quarks. The blackholes in the above argument become quarks in the argument that follows. Because the Current Paradigm electron is elementary, it is not subject to the strong force. 

The strong force multiprocess is not a simple matter of gravity versus antigravity. While rejectivity fulfills some of the aspects of an antigravity, the process is very different. Gravity, for no empirically understood reason, works at any distance with the decrease in its strength with increasing distance being governed by the inverse square law. Rejectivity, on the other hand, works only on physical contact and distance is not a factor. 

So far as the blackholepair is concerned, first consider the gravitons out of which the blackholes are made. The mutual gravitypull of each of the gravitons in each of the above blackholes can be felt even if the blackholes are on opposite sides of the Universe - albeit, that far apart it would be felt extremely weakly. The mutual rejectivity of the gravitons, however, is only felt when the blackholes are close enough for their gravitons to collide.

Consequently, the strength of the mutual gravitypull of the blackholes is always being felt at a strength that depends on their distance apart. The mutual rejectivity of the blackholes, on the other hand, is only felt when there is contact between their gravitonospheres - and then with a strength that is governed by the dynamic mass of those gravitonospheres. The higher the dynamic mass, the greater the rejectivity.

Many factors determine the dynamic mass of a gravitonosphere but as a general rule it is always greater, and sometimes much greater, nearer to the gravitonosphere/gravitonocean interface. For an equivalent, look at the Earth's atmosphere. Near to the surface of the planet, the dynamic mass is high but the decline with altitude is rapid. At the Earth's gravitysheath interface, the atmosphere still has a dynamic mass but it is a negligible one. Thus it is that for the gravitonospheres of the two blackholes to be mutually rejective enough to counter their mutual gravitypull, they must be close together.

Of especial note is that the ability of rejectivity to exactly counter gravitypull depends on the mass of the bound objects. Pairs of small quarks within an electron can only manage the trick if each is within a very specific mass range. The same is true of the trios of larger quarks within a nucleon, and the multiples of much larger nucleons within an atom, and the multiples of even larger atoms within nuclides. Whether objects even more massive can manage the trick is unproven but a possible example of this in action may be the squad of massive OB and Wolf-Rayet stars that are trapped close in to the Sagittarius A* blackhole (see Selfproof 0504).

CAVEAT:     It is possible that gravitonosphere rejectivity is not enough to keep the gravitoncores apart and that it is actually the rejectivity of the underlying gravitonoceans that does the job. This is an attractive idea that fits into the Template's description of electrons and nucleons just as well as does the use of gravitonosphere rejectivity. Indeed, in a number of ways the idea is a preferable one. However, as yet, there isn't enough information to justify opting for either one so, arbitrarily, the Template uses gravitonospheres as the primary rejective element.