THE MALTA COSMOLOGY TEMPLATE



Chapter 05 - Darkmatter






PARTS


Part 0500
Darkmatter
Home


Part 0501
Centrifugal

Blackholes

Part 0502
Axial

Blackholes

Part 0503
Teelospheres

as Darkmatter

Darkmatter
Selfproofs


















Darkmatter Selfproofs

SELFPROOF O504 - STARS AT A GALACTIC CENTRE

CURRENT PARADIGM
  • The central cubic parsec around Sagittarius A* contains around 10 million stars. Although most of them are old red giant stars, the Galactic Center is also rich in massive stars. More than 100 OB and Wolf–Rayet stars have been identified there so far. They seem to have all been formed in a single star formation event a few million years ago. The existence of these relatively young stars was a surprise to experts, who expected the tidal forces from the central black hole to prevent their formation. This paradox of youth is even stronger for stars that are on very tight orbits around Sagittarius A*, such as S2 and S0-102. The scenarios invoked to explain this formation involve either star formation in a massive star cluster offset from the Galactic Center that would have migrated to its current location once formed, or star formation within a massive, compact gas accretion disk around the central black-hole. Most of these 100 young, massive stars seem to be concentrated within one or two disks, rather than randomly distributed within the central parsec. This observation however does not allow definite conclusions to be drawn at this point. (Wikipedia 6 Aug 2012)
MALTA TEMPLATE
COMMENTARY

Sagittarius A* is the gravitoncore of the Milky Way blackhole. The gravitonosphere of this blackhole extends way beyond its disc of stars. The gravitonosphere is formed into gravitonstreams that give the blackhole a centrifugal structure. The realspeed of the gravitonosphere decreases with distance from the surface of the gravitoncore per the inverse square law. Consequently, within (say) half a parsec of the surface of the gravitoncore, the dynamic mass of the gravitonstreams is extremely high.

Because the dynamic mass of the gravitonstreams close to the gravitoncore's surface is so high, any stars here are being constantly engorged with excess gravitons. Consequently they are extremely understable and ejecting commensurate quantities of gravitons as they attempt to stabilise. They cannot stabilise, of course, because the engorgement is continuous and thus they are in a permanently understable state. They will stabilise eventually, when the blackhole itself approaches stability and their engorgement reduces sufficiently.

Understability in a star (a blackhole composite) is more complex than is understability in a blackhole (see Chapter 12 - Star Mechanics). Because the star is engorged with gravitons, the star's atoms are also engorged and thus are understable also. It may even be that the atom's nucleons are also engorged - and perhaps even the nucleon's quarks. Atoms, nucleons, and quarks each have their own mechanisms for achieving stability although the differences are in detail rather than principle. A notable difference is that understable atoms eject photons as part of their stabilisation process.

These stars are tightly packed around the blackhole's gravitoncore. Some are less than a lightyear apart and yet they do not collide. This is because these stars have a "grown up" version of the same Strong Force that binds quarks together. The stars are held in place by the gravitypull of the gravitoncore and by their own mutual gravitypull. They are kept apart by the rejectivity of their gravitonospheres. Because these stars are engorged with gravitons, they throw out a dense and fast moving gravitonosphere as they attempt stabilise. Thus the stars ride on each others gravitonospheres like pingpong balls riding on a jet of water. For a smaller scale version of this mechanism in action look at the way large numbers of electrons are able to orbit an atom without collision.

CONJECTURES FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

The above commentary is less than satisfactory, in part because I lack the resources to make it otherwise but also because I consider other parts of the Malta Template to be a greater priority. Nevertheless, research should continue. Investigating the following conjectures may be worth the spending of someone's time.
  • It may be that the number of stars clustering around the blackhole is conditioned by the mass of the blackhole in the same way that the number of electrons clustering around specific nuclei is controlled.
  • It may be that it is the blackhole's gravitonosphere that conditions the mass and dimensions of the stars. Atoms.do not control the mass and dimensions of their electrons but things might be different here.  
  • It may be that the markedly different nature of these stars, as compared to those only a short distance farther out, is because they are actually within the blackhole's gravitonocean, rather than its gravitonosphere. 
  • It may be that the number of these stars is conditioned by the mass and energy of the blackhole. One possibility is that if one star in the cluster decays for any reason it is replaced by one of the stars from outside the cluster which is then “rejuvenated” by becoming engorged as it is drawn closer to the star. Another is that if one star is ejected from the cluster, it is replaced by one which is "grown" by the blackhole (this option is more likely if the gravitoncore is actually a pair or a trio of gravitoncores because then the mechanism involved would be a "grown-up" version of photon production in atoms).







Comments and suggestions:  peter.ed.winchester@gmail.com

Copyright 2013 Peter (Ed) Winchester



REVISIONS

03 Jul 2014 - Page revised to 3-section format
08 Nov 2015 - Revisions to format and content.
18 Jun 2016 - Revisions to format and content.