THE MALTA COSMOLOGY TEMPLATE



Chapter 06 - Photons






PARTS

Part 0600
Photons
Home


Part 0601
Cosmic

Photon
Creation

Part 0602
Photon

Mechanics

Part 0603
Cosmic

Microwave
Background

Photon
Selfproofs



















Photon Selfproofs


Research in the Current Paradigm is devolutionary in character. There are two main forms of this devolution: either discoveries are made and explanations are sought or extrapolations are made and proof is sought. 

In contrast, the Malta Template is resolutely evolutionary. Following the Darwin Templature methodology, it kickstarts with the least substantial object that can be justified by the current factbase and evolves it forward in time and upward in size. Thereafter, the Template must selfprove by evolving from the kickstarting object into a Universe that looks and acts exactly as does the Universe about us - if it cannot do this the Template is wrong and must be rethought.

SELFPROOF 0614 - DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT

CURRENT PARADIGM
  • The modern DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles; moreover, it displays the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical phenomena. The original experiment was performed by Davisson and Germer in 1927. A simpler form of the double-slit experiment was performed by Thomas Young in 1801 (well before quantum mechanics). He believed it demonstrated that the wave theory of light was correct, and his experiment is sometimes referred to as Young's experiment or Young's slits. The experiment belongs to a general class of "double path" experiments, in which a wave is split into two separate waves that later combine into a single wave. Changes in the path lengths of both waves result in a phase shift, creating an interference pattern. Another version is the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, which splits the beam with a mirror. In the basic version of this experiment, a coherent light source, such as a laser beam, illuminates a plate pierced by two parallel slits, and the light passing through the slits is observed on a screen behind the plate. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through the two slits to interfere, producing bright and dark bands on the screen — a result that would not be expected if light consisted of classical particles.However, the light is always found to be absorbed at the screen at discrete points, as individual particles (not waves), the interference pattern appearing via the varying density of these particle hits on the screen. Furthermore, versions of the experiment that include detectors at the slits find that each detected photon passes through one slit (as would a classical particle), and not through both slits (as would a wave). However, such experiments demonstrate that particles do not form the interference pattern if one detects which slit they pass through. These results demonstrate the principle of wave–particle duality. (Wikipedia - 29 Jul 2017)

MALTA TEMPLATE
COMMENTARY

The double-slit experiments are taken as establishing that light has the characteristics of both particles and waves. Attempts at explaining what actually happens in a double-slit experiment are hampered by lacking crucial information, a consequence of the devolutionary nature of Current Paradigm research. The evolutionary Malta Template has enough information to be able to draw up a description that matches reality.

To understand what happens in a double slit experiment it is necessary to know that:  
It is also necessary to know of the environment within which the experiment is carried out - assuming it to be in a room on the surface of Planet Earth: 
  • the double-slit panel consists of solidbonded nuclides
  • the photon receiving screen consists of solidbonded nuclides.
  • the atmosphere in the room consists of gasbonded nucleons, nuclides and nuclide composites (O2, N2, etc).
  • the sub-atmosphere of the room consists of gravitons.
  • there are also neutrinos, electrons, pettyblackholes, etc but these are ignored for this selfproof. 
  • gravitons are insubstantial and easily able to pass between nucleons and nuclides.
  • gravitons are not subject to any form of cosmological speed limit.
  • some of the gravitons are emissions from nucleons and nuclides as part of their stabilisation processes.
  • the rest of the gravitons enter the room and leave it as part of a gravitonstream.
  • the gravitonstream is part of Planet Earth's gravitonosphere
  • the gravitonstream has a high dynamic mass and can move faster than lightspeed. 
The photons in the experiment have to cope with a constant bombardment of gravitons. When a stable photon absorbs a graviton it absorbs measures of energy and mass - notably, it absorbs proportionately more energy than mass which understabilises the photon. The stabilisation mechanism promptly reacts and ejects enough energy and mass to restabilise the photon.

The stabilisation mechanism is the photon's gravitonosphere and it is very efficient, being able to handle a prodigious absorption of gravitons. The gravitonosphere of a photon, being centrifugal, takes the form of a pair of vertical vortexes that surround the gravitoncore. Each vortex upwells at the equator and then moves to the poles, one to the north and one to the south. Each then downwells at its pole and moves at low level back to the equator from where it upwells again to repeat the cycle again and again. When additional gravitons are absorbed, the differential increase in mass and energy increases the speed of the equatorial upwelling so that the vergence velocity of some gravitons exceeds the escape velocity of the photon. The number of gravitons ejected in this way is just enough to return the mass and energy of the photon to stability.

Because the photon is constantly absorbing prodigious numbers of gravitons, it is constantly ejecting prodigious numbers of gravitons. Thus it is that the equator of the photon becomes a plenum above which is an annular exhaust. The fastest of the escaping gravitons go straight up while those with progressively less speed commensurately arc toward one or other of the poles. In this way, the photon is almost wholly surrounded by a "rejective shield" of energetically escaping gravitons that extends far beyond the photon's gravitysheath. It is this rejective shield that gives the photon particle its wavelike behaviour.
  • When photons are produced in large numbers, it is the rejective shields that prevent them from coming too close to each other. 
  • When photons are fired into a slit, it is the rejective shields that dictate how many photons can fit into the slit at the same time. 
  • When photons emerge from a slit, it is the rejective shields that force the photons to fan out.
  • When photons emerge from a pair of slits, it is the rejective shields that dictate the interference patterns that will form.
  • When photons are allowed to enter one slit only, gravitons from the rejective shields will enter the other slit.
One point should be strongly made. The nuclides that make up the walls of the slits all have gravitypulls, gravitysheaths, axiality, and chemospheres. Consequently, as photons pass through the slits they are affected by the nuclides and in return they affect the nuclides.

An extension to the double-slit experiment will be of value. The dynamic mass of the gravitonstreams in the Earth's gravitonosphere decreases with distance from the planet's centre of gravity as kineticenergy transmutes to potentialenergy. Because of this, in a photon of a specific wavelength, the rejectivity and the extent of its rejective shield will also decrease with distance from the centre of gravity. Double-slit experiments with same wavelength photons, performed at progressively greater distances from the planet's centre of gravity will result in measurably tighter interference patterns. This is not predicted in the Current Paradigm so, if it can be confirmed, can be taken as circumstantial evidence that the Malta Template is perhaps correct. 

CONCLUSION

There has never yet been a forensic examination of a photon so there is no empirically confirmed description of a photon's inner workings against which the Malta Template description can be compared. This means the only comparison can be with known photonic behaviour and here the Template does selfprove in that its photons do indeed behave as do the real photons employed in double-slit experiments.There are caveats in that some phenomena noted during some recent double-slit experiments are not readily explained by the above description. These will soon be dealt with in their own selfproofs - and if the selfproofs cannot resolve them the description will be reconsidered.







Comments and suggestions:  peter.ed.winchester@gmail.com

Copyright 2013 Peter (Ed) Winchester



REVISIONS

21 Jul 2014 - page revised to 3-section format.
20 Jul 2016 - revisions to content and layout.

23 Apr 2017 - changed teels to gravitons.
01 Aug 2017 - revision to content.