SELFPROOF 0612 - ANTIPHOTONSCURRENT PARADIGM
- Corresponding to most kinds of particles, there is an associated antimatter antiparticle with the same mass and opposite charge (including electric charge). For example, the antiparticle of the electron is the positively charged positron, which is produced naturally in certain types of radioactive decay. ..... Although particles and their antiparticles have opposite charges,
electrically neutral particles need not be identical to their
antiparticles. The neutron, for example, is made out of quarks, the antineutron from antiquarks,
and they are distinguishable from one another because neutrons and
antineutrons annihilate each other upon contact. However, other neutral
particles are their own antiparticles, such as photons, hypothetical gravitons, and some WIMPs. (Wikipedia - 19 Jul 2016)
MALTA TEMPLATE
COMMENTARY
In
the Current Paradigm it is accepted that there is no antiphoton in the
sense that there is a photonic particle that is different from a
conventional particle. This is also true of the Malta Template. It may help, at this stage, to clarify the Malta Template position as regards antiparticles in general: - In the Malta Template, only axially structured particles can appear as antiparticles.
- In
the Malta Template, axially structured particles are charged particles
and thus have antiparticles with an opposite charge.
- In
the Malta Template, centrifugally structured particles are uncharged
particles and thus do not have antiparticles with an opposite
charge.
- In
the Malta Template, neutrally charged composite particles contain
axially structured particles and are therefore semicharged particles
and thus have antiparticles with a (semi) opposite charge.
Charge
is the spin direction of a particle together with the flow direction of
its outer gravitonstreams (from one pole to the other). Over time,
particles entropically align their charge with that of their
neighbours. This is one reason why the Universe appears to be made of
matter rather than antimatter. It doesn't mean that the Universe itself
is charged (although it may be), merely that neighbouring charged
particles tend to be aligned. In practice, there is no way to
identify an isolated particle as matter or antimatter - the
identification is all in the comparison. That comparison is most
noticeable when particles of opposite charge collide with their
consequent annihilation being caused by their opposite axial structure.
|