THE MALTA COSMOLOGY TEMPLATE



Chapter 03 - Blackholes






PARTS

Part 0300
Blackhole
Home Page


Part 0301
Gravitonpair

Physics

Part 0302
Blackhole

Physics

Part 0303
Blackhole

Structure

Part 0304
Blackhole Mechanics


Part 0305
Blackhole Attunement


Blackhole Selfproofs


















Part 0304 - Blackhole Mechanics

ARGUMENT 0304-05

PRECEDENTS PARAMETERS
  • Consider that every blackhole is surrounded by a gravitysheath interface.
  • Consider that the mass of a blackhole is contained within its gravitysheath interface.
  • Consider that the energy of a blackhole is contained within its gravitysheath interface.
  • Consider that every blackhole consists of gravitonpairs and thus has an escape velocity.
  • Consider that every blackhole consists of gravitonpairs and thus has a vergence velocity.
  • Consider that the escape velocity is always zero at the gravitysheath interface. 
  • Consider that the vergence velocity is a variable at the gravitysheath interface.
  • Consider that absorbing one graviton increases the absolute mass of a blackhole by the mass of one graviton.
  • Consider that absorbing the potentialspeed, realspeed, and spin of one graviton alters the energy of a blackhole by a variable measure. 
REASONING
  • Absorbing one graviton adds the mass of one graviton to the absolute mass of a blackhole but the escape velocity at the gravitysheath interface continues to be zero.
  • Absorbing one graviton adds a variable measure of energy to that of the blackhole so the vergence velocity at the gravitysheath interface can decrease or increase. 
CONCLUSION
  • That a blackhole absorbing one graviton maintains its escape velocity at the gravitysheath interface but alters its vergence velocity.


COMMENTARY

What happens here is one of the most important mechanisms in the Universe:  that the absorbing or ejecting of gravitons alters the mass and energy measures of the gaining or losing object differentially. If this mechanism didn't exist, objects could never stabilise or destabilise and the wide range of different objects we see about us in the Universe couldn't exist in their current form. Without this mechanism there would be no photons, no atoms, no stars, no galaxies - no us.

Note that this argument allows an absorbed graviton to bring less energy to the blackhole than mass. However,  while this undoubtedly happens it is not the norm in the Universe as it currently is. That this is so can be seen if we visualise some examples from a contrary Universe:
  • PHOTONS:  (see Chapter Six):  Photons rely on a mass/energy differential favouring energy to keep moving at lightspeed. With a differential that absorbs more mass than energy, photons cannot help but decelerate and will accrue mass rapidly. In practice, these would cease to be photons at all, being nothing more than permanently overstable blackholes with a lusty appetite for accretion.  
  • GALACTIC BLACKHOLES:  (See Chapter Thirteen):  Observations show that, while galactic blackholes dominate the surrounding matter with their mighty gravitypull, they are selective about when they "eat". They have quiescent periods and even in non-quiescent periods their appetite is not exactly voracious. This is exactly what happens if the mass/energy differential in the absorption and ejection of gravitons favours energy. With such a differential, the default condition for a blackhole is to be stable:  an understable galactic blackhole can only feed sparingly if at all:  an overstable galactic blackhole will certainly gluttonise but only till it becomes stable again. Contrast this description with a galactic blackhole driven by a mass/energy differential which absorbs more mass than energy. In such a blackhole the default condition, indeed the only condition, is to be overstable. Such a blackhole is never able to eject more than it absorbs. Consequently, it eats anything and everything with its rate of growth in size and appetite being near to exponential. Every graviton it absorbs increases its mass and every increase in mass increases the blackhole's ability to attract yet more mass.  







Comments and suggestions:  peter.ed.winchester@gmail.com

Copyright 2013 Peter (Ed) Winchester



REVISIONS

10 Apr 2015 - Major revisions to layout, content, and numbering
12 Apr 2016 - Revisions to layout and content.
17 Apr 2016 - Added Commentary 2.
20 Jan 2017 - revisions to layout and content.
22 Apr 2017 - change teels to gravitons.