THE MALTA COSMOLOGY TEMPLATE



Chapter 01 - Physics






PARTS

Part 0100
Physics
Home


Part 0101
Kickstarter


Part 0102
Graviton

Properties


Part 0103
Energy


Part 0104
Spinspeed


Part 0105
Space


Part 0106
Time


Physics
Selfproofs



















Physics Selfproofs

SELFPROOF 0103 - ELEMENTARY BOSONS

CURRENT PARADIGM
MALTA TEMPLATE
  • FERMIONS AND BOSONS
    • Fermions are accretion particles;  that is, particles which grow through the capture of gravitons either individually or as larger particles made of gravitons. 
    • Bosons are stabilisation particles;  that is, particles created during the stabilisation of larger particles. 
    • Some stabilisation particles, photons and electrons, are themselves stable. 
    • Other stabilisation particles, the W, Z, and the Higgs, do not stabilise and decay rapidly. 
  • PHOTONS
  • W and Z BOSONS
    • Chapter 7:   Electrons
    • Chapter 8:   Nucleons
    • Chapter 9:   Atoms
    • W and Z bosons are understable bosons.
    • W and Z bosons are created during the stabilisation of specific objects in specific conditions.
    • The existence of W and Z bosons has been confirmed by colliding objects at high energies.
    • Colliding objects with known measures in known conditions has predictable consequences.
  • GLUONS
    • Chapter 7:   Electrons
    • Chapter 8:   Nucleons
    • Gluons are understable bosons.
    • Gluons are created (?) within the strong force.
    • The strong force is the interaction responsible for binding quarks/antiquarks together to make hadrons.
    • The strong force is a multiprocess in which the mutual gravitational attraction of the quarks is countered by the rejectivity of their gravitonoceans and/or their gravitonospheres.
    • In the strong force multiprocess there is no specific need for an exchange particle such as the gluon. 
    • Which is not to say gluons do not exist.
    • The existence of gluons has been confirmed by colliding objects at high energies.
    • Colliding objects with known measures in known conditions has predictable consequences. 
  • HIGGS BOSONS
    • 0102-01:   That every graviton has these properties:   mass, spin, and rejectivity.
    • 0102-02:   That every graviton has the same measure of mass.
    • 0103-01:   That every graviton attracts every other graviton in the Universe at a rate proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. 
    • 0202-03:   That gravitons are eternal.
    • Mass and gravity are two sides of the same coin.
    • The Malta Template currently has no explanation for either mass or gravity.
    • Selfproof 0122:   If there is a level below that of gravitons, an explanation for mass/gravity may be found.
    • The Malta Template, at the level of gravitons, has no need for an exchange particle such as the Higgs Boson.
    • Which is not to say that the Higgs Boson does not exist.
    • The existence of the Higgs Boson has been confirmed by colliding objects at high energies.
    • Colliding objects with known measures in known conditions has predictable consequences. 
  • GRAVITONS
    • 0101-01:   That each type of elementary fermion consists of a minimum of two gravitons.
    • 0102-02:   That every graviton has the same measure of mass.
    • 0102-05:   That every graviton has the same dimensions.
    • 0102-06:   That every graviton is a sphere.
    • 0103-01:   That every graviton attracts every other graviton in the Universe at a rate proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
    • Selfproof 0122:   Every graviton is identical to every other graviton - thus every graviton is a quantum of gravity.
    • The graviton is expected to be a massless, chargeless, stable, spin-2 boson:
      • MASS
        • 0102-01:   That mass is a property of the graviton.
        • The graviton's mass equates to its gravity - eg:  one unit of mass = one unit of gravity.
        • If the graviton were deemed to have no mass and only gravity, there would be no effect on the evolution of the Malta Template.
        • If the graviton were deemed to have no mass and only gravity it would be a graviton, subject to the note on spin below.
      • CHARGE
        • 0102-01:   That charge is not a property of the graviton.
      • STABILITY
        • 0101-01:   The graviton has no structure.
        • 0202-03:   The graviton is eternal.
        • Thus the graviton is permanently stable.
      • SPIN
        • 0102-01:   That spin is a property of the graviton.
        • 0102-03:   That every graviton's spinrate is measured in revolutions per time period.
        • The spin of a graviton is a quantised spin.
        • A quantised spinrate is an average spinrate and is thus able to accommodate a range of "real life" spinrates.
        • Thus the spinrates of the graviton and the graviton may be reconcilable.
COMMENTARY

The Current Paradigm begins at "today" and works backward in time. The Malta Template begins as far back in time as can be justified by facts and works forward. Thus the two work toward each other and, more often than not, deliver the same results. Not always however and where they do disagree (as they do in parts of this chapter) it is worth looking closely at the selfproving abilities of the two methodologies.

The Malta Template selfproves by making a deduction and then relating it to real life. Ultimately, this requires the Template to be evolved forward in time to the point where it becomes a description of the Universe as we know it to be. If this cannot be done, the deduction is wrong.

The Current Paradigm is less able to selfprove. As a general rule, it theorises on the basis of what is already known (or rather too often, on the basis of what has been previously theorised, thus creating potential quasifacts). It then attempts to confirm the theory by experiment and/or observation. The problem here is well known and understood - what is seen in experiment/observation may fit the theory but that doesn't necessarily made the theory right. Ptolemy's geocentric universe was the "current paradigm" for fifteen hundred years. It was wrong but it worked so it was assumed by the establishment to be true.

Consider the W, Z, and Higgs bosons. They were proposed. They were searched for. Something was observed that corresponded with what was proposed. Thus they are indeed real and the proposals are true. Or are they? Are the bosons that have been observed actually what they are supposed to be. According to the weaker selfproving of the Current Paradigm, yes. According to the stronger selfproving of the Malta Template, no.








Comments and suggestions:  peter.ed.winchester@gmail.com

Copyright 2013 Peter (Ed) Winchester




REVISIONS

01 May 2014 - Page revised to 3-section format.
07 Nov 2014 - text revisions
20 Mar 2015 - revisions to layout, content, and numbering
10 Aug 2016 - revisions to content and layout.
19 Apr 2017 - teels changed to gravitons.