The
General Theory of Relativity (1915) suggests that gravity is a
consequence of the curvature of space due to the presence of matter.
There are many instances where the mathematics agree with what is
observed although there is no direct proof that the interpretation is
correct. Nevertheless, the interpretation is liked by many in the
physics community and is a central plank in the Current Paradigm.
Yet
again, however, this is an instance of the interpretation being made at
too high a level in nature's scheme of things. At the lower level dealt
with in this chapter, space is a nothingness and thus cannot curve. At
the same time, gravity is a property of the graviton, a property that is
known to exist but for which the Malta Template can offer no
explanation - with logic suggesting that the explanation for gravity
may come at a level even lower than gravitons.
If the mathematical
basis for the General Theory is sound and it is the interpretation of
the maths that is at fault, is there a valid interpretation within the
Malta Template that would account for the apparent curvature of space
and the apparent dilation of time? Yes there is. It is to be
found in
Chapter Four which deals with darkenergy and
Chapter Five
which deals with darkmatter. The difference between darkenergy and
darkmatter is one of location and otherwise they are the same thing.
They are the
gravitonospheres, the streams of gravitons that extensively
surround the
solidbonded cores of the
blackholes that are to be found
everywhere in the Universe (see
Chapter Three).
These gravitonospheres are invisible to us because gravitons are smaller than
photons but their effects are very real. They distort the courses of
objects that pass through them, giving the appearance of space
curvature, and they accelerate or decelerate
mechanisms and
processes,
giving the appearance of time dilation.
The Malta Template is
drawn from the facts of the physics knowledgebase and not from the
conjectures of the Current Paradigm. Thus it can only describe the
consequences of gravitypull because, as yet, there are not enough facts
from which to deduce a comprehensive explanation.